College bans interracial dating
In terms of out-marriage, Hispanic males who identified as White had non-Hispanic wives more often than other Hispanic men.The table shows that among whites who out-married in 2008, there were different patterns by gender in the race of their spouses.More than a quarter of white men (26.9%) married an Asian woman, and about 6.9% married a black woman.In contrast, 20.1% of white women married a black man, while just 9.4% married an Asian man.A slightly higher proportion of white women than white men married a Hispanic person (51% versus 46%), and a similar share of each gender married someone in the other group. S.-raised are much more likely to be married to Whites than their non-U. Of all the Asian American groups studied, Indian Americans showed the highest rates of endogamy, with the overwhelming majority of Indian American women and men marrying Indian American partners.
Likewise, since Hispanic is not a race but an ethnicity, Hispanic marriages with non-Hispanics are not registered as interracial if both partners are of the same race (i.e.
White wife/Black husband marriages are twice as likely to divorce by the 10th year of marriage compared to White/White couples, while White wife/Asian husband marriages are 59% more likely to end in divorce compared to White/White unions.
However, a 2009 study a year later by Yaunting Zhang and Jennifer Van Hook on behalf of Journal of Marriage and Family using a larger sample size than the previous study produced different results with Asian female/White male marriages shown as the least likely to divorce of any marriage pairing.
The number of interracial marriages has steadily continued to increase since the 1967 Supreme Court ruling in Loving v.
Virginia, but also continues to represent an absolute minority among the total number of wed couples.
a Black Hispanic marrying a non-Hispanic Black partner).